Filter by Themen
Filter by Kategorien
Filter by Veranstaltungsschlagworte
FS Logoi

Water resources: special report about the polluter pays principle reveals inconsistency

The European Court of Auditors (ECA) recently published its Special Report ‘The Polluter Pays Principle (PPP) - Inconsistent application across EU environmental policies and actions’. It concludes that, although enshrined in the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU (TFEU), the PPP is included in European legislative acts to varying degrees and its application remains patchy across the Union.

von | 27.07.21

The European Court of Auditors (ECA) recently published its Special Report ‘The Polluter Pays Principle (PPP) – Inconsistent application across EU environmental policies and actions’. It concludes that, although enshrined in the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU (TFEU), the PPP is included in European legislative acts to varying degrees and its application remains patchy across the Union.

According to the ECA, the PPP ‘requires that polluters should bear the costs of their pollution including the cost of measures taken to prevent, control and remedy pollution and the costs it imposes on society’. ECA found out that polluters only partially bear the cost of contaminating our water resources, in particular when it comes to diffuse pollution.

EurEau has called for a wider implementation of the PPP for many years now. It should kick in when the Precautionary and the Control-at-Source Principles cannot fully address the release of certain pollutants in the environment.

We therefore welcome this ECA call for action. At the same time, we are encouraged to see that the European Commission is assessing the feasibility of implementing the PPP through extended producer responsibility schemes (EPR) under the future Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive. This innovative approach responds to one of the ECA’s key conclusions: the need to address diffuse pollution. At the same time, making the polluters pay for extra treatment steps in waste water treatment plants (UWWTP) would ensure that households are not footing the full bill of water contamination they may not be able to control.

On the other hand, drinking water suppliers are left alone when they have to add resource- and cost-intensive treatment steps to remove nitrates, pesticides and PFAS from water resources to protect the health of water consumers. The ECA explicitly points at agriculture as the sector that pays the least for the pollution its causes. With this in mind, EurEau sees the need to implement the PPP in the Nitrates Directive and the Sustainable Use of Pesticides Directive (currently under review).

As regards industrial pollution, the ongoing revision of the Industrial Emissions Directive should lead to the inclusion of smaller installations in its scope and strengthen polluter-pays-related provisions. If industrial installations are authorised to release industrial waste water into the urban sewer network, they should bear the costs of monitoring, extra treatment in UWWTP and remediation and management of contaminated sewage sludge.

When it comes to PFAS, only a far-reaching ban can protect our water resources from decades of contamination. The planned REACH restriction should include an EPR scheme, to make producers pay for extra treatment in drinking water works and WWTP. As a matter of example, while reverse osmosis can remove most PFAS from water, it will increase the annual drinking water bill of an average family by €100-200.

Obviously, this is not the way the ECA has in mind. The PPP should never be replaced by the water-consumer-pays principle. The ongoing revision of many water-related EU legislation offers the opportunity to provide a solid response to the ECA recommendations.

 

Bildquelle, falls nicht im Bild oben angegeben:

(Source: EurEau)

Jetzt Newsletter abonnieren

Stoff für Ihr Wissen, jede Woche in Ihrem Postfach.

Hier anmelden

The role of nanoplastic in marine pollution is greater than assumed
The role of nanoplastic in marine pollution is greater than assumed

Nanoplastic particles are less than one micrometre in size, but by mass, their share in marine pollution is comparable to that of microplastic. This is the result of a study conducted by scientists from the Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ) and the Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research (NIOZ).

mehr lesen
Joint Danube Survey 5: Großes Donau-Untersuchungsprojekt startet
Joint Danube Survey 5: Großes Donau-Untersuchungsprojekt startet

Alle sechs Jahre führen Experten aus dem Donauraum eine gemeinsame Untersuchung der Donau namens „Joint Danube Survey“ durch. In diesem Jahr realisiert die Internationale Kommission zum Schutz der Donau (IKSD), Österreich, gemeinsam mit 13 weiteren Donauländern das weltweit größte Überwachungsprojekt an Oberflächengewässern mit 100 beteiligten Institutionen.

mehr lesen
Pharmaindustrie klagt gegen KARL
Pharmaindustrie klagt gegen KARL

Die Klage der pharmazeutischen und kosmetischen Industrie gegen die Kommunalabwasserrichtlinie (KARL) liegt vor dem Gericht der Europäischen Union. BDEW und VKU haben die Zulassung als Streithelfer beantragt.

mehr lesen

Passende Firmen zum Thema:

Sie möchten die gwf Wasser + Abwasser testen

Bestellen Sie Ihr kostenloses Probeheft

Überzeugen Sie sich selbst: Gerne senden wir Ihnen die gwf Wasser + Abwasser kostenlos und unverbindlich zur Probe!

Finance Illustration 03