Suche...
Generic filters
Filter by Themen
Abwasserbehandlung
Analytik & Hygiene
Digitalisierung
Energie
Engineering
Events
gwf - Wasser|Abwasser
Industriewasser
Kosten & Tarife
Nachhaltigkeit & Umweltschutz
Netze
Politik
Recht & Regelwerk
Wasser & Abwasser
Wasseraufbereitung
Wassergewinnung
Wasserstress
Water Solutions
Filter by Kategorien
Branche
Forschung & Entwicklung
Leute
People
Products & Solutions
Produkte & Verfahren
Publications
Publikationen
Sonstiges
Trade & Industry
Filter by Kategorien
Firmenverzeichnis
Geschützte Downloads
Mediadaten
Öffentliche Downloads
Filter by Veranstaltungsschlagworte
abwasser
ACHEMA
Automatisierung
FDBR
Hydrologie
kanalnetze
MSR
Talsperren
trinkwasser
wasseraufbereitung
wasserbau
Wassernetze
Wasserversorgung

Water resources: special report about the polluter pays principle reveals inconsistency

Kategorie:
Themen: |
Autor: Finn Gidion

Water resources: special report about the polluter pays principle reveals inconsistency
(Source: EurEau)

The European Court of Auditors (ECA) recently published its Special Report ‘The Polluter Pays Principle (PPP) – Inconsistent application across EU environmental policies and actions’. It concludes that, although enshrined in the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU (TFEU), the PPP is included in European legislative acts to varying degrees and its application remains patchy across the Union.

According to the ECA, the PPP ‘requires that polluters should bear the costs of their pollution including the cost of measures taken to prevent, control and remedy pollution and the costs it imposes on society’. ECA found out that polluters only partially bear the cost of contaminating our water resources, in particular when it comes to diffuse pollution.

EurEau has called for a wider implementation of the PPP for many years now. It should kick in when the Precautionary and the Control-at-Source Principles cannot fully address the release of certain pollutants in the environment.

We therefore welcome this ECA call for action. At the same time, we are encouraged to see that the European Commission is assessing the feasibility of implementing the PPP through extended producer responsibility schemes (EPR) under the future Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive. This innovative approach responds to one of the ECA’s key conclusions: the need to address diffuse pollution. At the same time, making the polluters pay for extra treatment steps in waste water treatment plants (UWWTP) would ensure that households are not footing the full bill of water contamination they may not be able to control.

On the other hand, drinking water suppliers are left alone when they have to add resource- and cost-intensive treatment steps to remove nitrates, pesticides and PFAS from water resources to protect the health of water consumers. The ECA explicitly points at agriculture as the sector that pays the least for the pollution its causes. With this in mind, EurEau sees the need to implement the PPP in the Nitrates Directive and the Sustainable Use of Pesticides Directive (currently under review).

As regards industrial pollution, the ongoing revision of the Industrial Emissions Directive should lead to the inclusion of smaller installations in its scope and strengthen polluter-pays-related provisions. If industrial installations are authorised to release industrial waste water into the urban sewer network, they should bear the costs of monitoring, extra treatment in UWWTP and remediation and management of contaminated sewage sludge.

When it comes to PFAS, only a far-reaching ban can protect our water resources from decades of contamination. The planned REACH restriction should include an EPR scheme, to make producers pay for extra treatment in drinking water works and WWTP. As a matter of example, while reverse osmosis can remove most PFAS from water, it will increase the annual drinking water bill of an average family by €100-200.

Obviously, this is not the way the ECA has in mind. The PPP should never be replaced by the water-consumer-pays principle. The ongoing revision of many water-related EU legislation offers the opportunity to provide a solid response to the ECA recommendations.

 

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

RIWA and Vewin: Call for concerted action to protect the surface water sources of drinking water
Solar water purification by using a water absorbing gel
Water in a loop: how to combat water scarcity on remote islands

Passende Firmen zum Thema:

Publikationen

Water Sensitive Urban Design as a Role Model for Water Management in Germany?

Water Sensitive Urban Design as a Role Model for Water Management in Germany?

Autor: Jacqueline Hoyer / Juliane Ziegler
Themenbereich: gwf - Wasser|Abwasser
Erscheinungsjahr: 2013

“Water Sensitive Urban Design” (WSUD), originally developed in Australia, is a planning and design approach combining the functionality of water management with principles of urban design. WSUD is mainly used in the development of integrated ...

Zum Produkt

Tertiary Filtration with Ultrafiltration Membranes in Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants

Tertiary Filtration with Ultrafiltration Membranes in Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants

Autor: Martin Wett and Eberhard Back
Themenbereich: gwf - Wasser|Abwasser
Erscheinungsjahr: 2011

During the operation of tertiary filtration stages in a dead-end-mode, retentate concentrate and rinsing water from membrane cleaning accrue naturally. Work on process solutions for these process waters with no additional particle loads for the ...

Zum Produkt

Water Solutions – 01 2017

Water Solutions – 01 2017

Themenbereich: Water Solutions
Erscheinungsjahr: 2017

The leading professional magazine for water and wastewater ...

Zum Produkt

Mehr Publikationen...

Sie möchten die gwf Wasser + Abwasser testen

Bestellen Sie Ihr kostenloses Probeheft

Überzeugen Sie sich selbst: Gerne senden wir Ihnen die gwf Wasser + Abwasser kostenlos und unverbindlich zur Probe!

Finance Illustration 03